Lamar Ten. v. Met. Bd. of Zon.

2 Citing cases

  1. Snpco v. City of Jefferson

    No. E2009-02355-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2010)

    Accordingly, the plain language of section 13-7-208(b)(1) protects preexisting legitimate business operations from the enforcement of "subsequent changes in zoning restrictions. . . ." Smith County, 304 S.W.3d at 311 (emphasis added); accord Lamar Tenn., LLC v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 2010 WL 761290, at *8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2010), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Sept. 27, 2010) ("By its express terms, the statutory exception in Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-7-208 is limited to changes in 'zoning' restrictions or regulations.").

  2. Brundage v. Cumberland Cnty.

    357 S.W.3d 361 (Tenn. 2011)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that courts should give effect to the substance of a pleading rather than its form or title

    Code Ann. §§ 13–7–101 to –119 (2011)) (counties); Act of Feb. 12, 1935, ch. 44, 1935 Tenn. Pub. Acts 117 (codified as amended at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 13–7–201 to –212 (2011)) (cities); see also Lamar Tenn., LLC v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, No. M2007–00883–COA–R3–CV, 2010 WL 761290, at *4 (Tenn.Ct.App. Mar. 5, 2010), perm. app. denied (Tenn.2010); KLN Assocs. v. Metro Dev. & Hous. Agency, 797 S.W.2d 898, 902 (Tenn.Ct.App.1990).