From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaManna v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted March 1, 2000.

April 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated April 30, 1999, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e, and granted the plaintiff's cross motion to serve an amended notice of claim.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Lawrence A. Silver of counsel), for appellant.

Rosner Nocera, New York, N.Y. (John P. Foudy of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and in granting the plaintiff's cross motion to serve an amended notice of claim (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e[6]).


Summaries of

LaManna v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

LaManna v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROSEANN LaMANNA, respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, defendant, NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 915