Lam v. Washington Mutual, Inc.

Full title: Vinh H. LAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.; et al.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 25, 2001

13 F. App'x 546 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

13 Fed.Appx. 546 (9th Cir. 2001) Vinh H. LAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-56003. D.C. No. CV-00-04566-CM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 25, 2001

Submitted June 11, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Carlos R. Moreno, District Judge, Presiding.

Before O'SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Vinh H. Lam appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction

Page 547.

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) dismissal. Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037, 121 S.Ct. 627, 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000). We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation filed on May 10, 2000, and adopted by the district court in its order filed on May 24, 2000.

To the extent that Lam's "Oral Argument and Additional Citations," filed on March 19, 2001, requests relief, that relief is denied.

AFFIRMED.