Opinion
Record No. 0655-11-4
08-16-2011
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL LAM v. TOWN OF LURARY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL GROUP SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION
(Arthur L. Goff; Bushey, Cave & Goff, on brief), for appellant. (William S. Sands, Jr.; Duncan & Hopkins, P.C., on brief), for appellees.
Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis
Justice McClanahan participated in the decision of this case prior to her investiture as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Arthur L. Goff; Bushey, Cave & Goff, on brief), for appellant.
(William S. Sands, Jr.; Duncan & Hopkins, P.C., on brief), for appellees.
Christopher Michael Lam appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission. He asserts the commission erred in (1) affirming the decision of the deputy commissioner that he abandoned his claim for a shoulder injury; (2) affirming the decision of the deputy commissioner that his claim was barred by the statute of limitations; (3) addressing the factual issue of causation because the decision that the claim had been time-barred was factual and dispositive, and the adjudication of the issue of causation was gratuitous and unnecessary; (4) addressing the factual issue of causation without providing notice to him; and (5) concluding there was no persuasive evidence he suffered a left shoulder injury in the accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Lam v. Town of Luray Law Enforcement. VWC File No. 234-59-44 (Mar. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.