From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lalani v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to establish entitlement to vacatur of a default in interposing an answer, the defendants were required to establish the existence of a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense ( see, Rebeil Consulting Corp. v. Kappa Realty Corp., 244 A.D.2d 540; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). The defendants failed to do so.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lalani v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Lalani v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:HAMID I. LALANI et al., Respondents, v. EDUARDO SANTIAGO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Lalani

The Supreme Court granted Lalani's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) based on the…

Lalani v. Santiago

The defendants failed to timely serve an answer and the plaintiffs were granted a judgment upon their…