From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lakeview Loan Servicing v. Hurst

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2017-08892 2017-08894 Index No. 6157/14

12-23-2020

LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, respondent, v. Gabriella HURST, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.

Anthony J. LoPresti, Garden City, N.Y. (Gail M. Blasie of counsel), for appellants. Schiller, Knapp, Lefkowitz & Hertzel, LLP, Latham, N.Y. (Gregory J. Sanda of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony J. LoPresti, Garden City, N.Y. (Gail M. Blasie of counsel), for appellants.

Schiller, Knapp, Lefkowitz & Hertzel, LLP, Latham, N.Y. (Gregory J. Sanda of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., HECTOR D. LASALLE, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Gabriella Hurst and Crystal Gay appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Thomas A. Adams), entered June 27, 2017, and (2) a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court, also entered June 27, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon an order of the same court dated March 2, 2016, granting the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants, to strike their answer, and for an order of reference, granted the plaintiff's motion to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and denied the cross motion of those defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The judgment of foreclosure and sale, upon the order entered June 27, 2017, inter alia, confirmed the referee's report and directed the sale of the subject premises.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered June 27, 2017, is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment of foreclosure and sale is reversed, on the law, those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Gabriella Hurst and Crystal Gay, to strike their answer, and for an order of reference is denied, those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were to confirm the referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale are denied, and the orders entered June 27, 2017, and March 2, 2016, are modified accordingly; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants Gabriella Hurst and Crystal Gay. The appeal from the order entered June 27, 2017, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment of foreclosure and sale (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

The Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Gabriella Hurst and Crystal Gay, to strike those defendants' answer, and for an order of reference, on the issue of RPAPL 1304, for reasons stated in Citimortgage, Inc. v. Erani, 180 A.D.3d 641, 643–644, 118 N.Y.S.3d 654 ).

In light of the foregoing determination, we need not address the appellants' remaining contentions.

DILLON, J.P., LASALLE, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lakeview Loan Servicing v. Hurst

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Lakeview Loan Servicing v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, respondent, v. Gabriella Hurst, et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 1385
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7878