From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lakeview Creamery v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty

Supreme Court of California
May 26, 1937
9 Cal.2d 779 (Cal. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 16003.

May 26, 1937.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge thereof, to settle reporter's transcript on appeal. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Sylvan Y. Allen and Harry C. Hedberg for Petitioners.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, Douglas DeCoster, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Lewis D. Sollings and Amos Friedman for Respondents.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter's transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.

[1] Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L.A. No. 15888 ( ante, p. 16 [ 68 P.2d 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.

The petition is denied.

Rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Lakeview Creamery v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty

Supreme Court of California
May 26, 1937
9 Cal.2d 779 (Cal. 1937)
Case details for

Lakeview Creamery v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty

Case Details

Full title:LAKEVIEW CREAMERY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 26, 1937

Citations

9 Cal.2d 779 (Cal. 1937)
68 P.2d 971