From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laka v. Columbia Pen & Pencil Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 13, 1963
324 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 120, Docket 28356.

Argued October 30, 1963.

Decided November 13, 1963.

John M. Calimafde, New York City, N.Y., for appellants. Hopgood Calimafde, Eugene J. Kalil, and Paul H. Blaustein, New York City, of counsel.

Holman Holman, Mineola, N.Y., for appellees. Bader Bader, New York City, Assoc. Attys. I. Walton Bader, New York City, of counsel.

Before SWAN, CLARK and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing their complaint in a suit charging infringement of the three claims of Patent No. 2,907,302, issued on October 6, 1959 to L. Raszl, assignor to Laka Tool and Stamping Company, Westbury, N.Y. The patent is for control mechanism of a ball point pen. Judge Mishler found that the claims were anticipated by the prior art and that Raszl's combination would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art. We see no necessity for adding to his well-reasoned opinion. The decree is affirmed.


Summaries of

Laka v. Columbia Pen & Pencil Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 13, 1963
324 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Laka v. Columbia Pen & Pencil Co.

Case Details

Full title:John LAKA, d/b/a Laka Tool Stamping Company, and Laka Tool Stamping…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 1963

Citations

324 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1963)