From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lairson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 26, 1965
388 S.W.2d 592 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

March 26, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Clark County, H.O. Porter, J.

Buddy Wayne Lairson, pro se.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., Martin Glazer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.


Buddy Lairson appeals from an order of the Clark Circuit Court which overruled, without a hearing or appointment of counsel, his motion under RCr 11.42 to vacate a judgment by which he was given a life sentence as an habitual criminal.

The grounds of the motion were (1) that the indictment was defective because it did not state the section number of the habitual criminal statute, and (2) the trial court did not give notice to the Commissioner of Mental Health as required by KRS 203.340.

Neither of these grounds is such as would warrant relief under RCr 11.42. As to the first ground, see Warner v. Commonwealth, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 77. As to the second ground see Mercer v. Commonwealth, Ky., 346 S.W.2d 761, and Etherton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 379 S.W.2d 730.

Since the motion showed on its face that there was no valid ground for relief, the movant was not entitled to a hearing or to appointment of counsel. Odewahn v. Commonwealth, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 163.

The judgment is affirmed,


Summaries of

Lairson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 26, 1965
388 S.W.2d 592 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Lairson v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Buddy Wayne LAIRSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Mar 26, 1965

Citations

388 S.W.2d 592 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Knuckles

) Merely from February until March is not an unreasonable delay. In regard to the evidentiary hearing, one…

Brister v. Commonwealth

The only ground which we may properly consider is appellant's claim that noncompliance with KRS 210.360…