From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 29, 1938
97 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

No. 8678.

June 29, 1938.

Petition for Review of Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals (District of Texas).

Petition by Roy H. Laird to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals redetermining a deficiency in a tax imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Decision affirmed.

Harry C. Weeks, of Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner.

Helen R. Carloss, Lucius Buck, and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J.P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Frank M. Thompson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.


The question presented for decision in this case is whether petitioner, who had executed an oil and gas lease for a consideration paid partly in cash and to be paid partly out of oil to be produced from the lease, but without retaining a royalty interest, was entitled to depletion on the cash received. The Board decided that petitioner was not entitled to claim depletion on the cash payment. We may refer to the opinion of the Board for the facts in detail without repeating them. See 35 B.T.A. 75. On the authority of Commissioner v. Fleming, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 324; Blankenship v. United States, 5 Cir., 95 F.2d 507; Helvering v. O'Donnell, 58 S.Ct. 619, 82 L.Ed. ___; and Helvering v. Elbe Oil Land Development Co., 58 S.Ct. 621, 82 L.Ed. ___, the decision of the Board is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 29, 1938
97 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:LAIRD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 1938

Citations

97 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1938)

Citing Cases

Hammonds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Hence, any depletion allowance should be predicated on that economic interest. It follows that petitioner was…

Cullen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

We do not agree with the Board's holding that the transfer was not divisible. The facts support the…