From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laiosa v. Republic Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 1995
217 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We disagree with the Supreme Court's finding that the defendant's requests for additional documents were unreasonable or irrelevant to the investigation of the plaintiffs' claim. Nevertheless, under the circumstances of this case, including the plaintiffs' substantial cooperation in the investigation and their subsequent production of the requested documents, we conclude that the defendant has failed to sustain its burden of demonstrating that the plaintiffs engaged in a pattern of willful noncooperation so as to warrant dismissal of their first cause of action ( cf., Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 197 A.D.2d 672). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Laiosa v. Republic Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 1995
217 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Laiosa v. Republic Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL LAIOSA et al., Respondents, v. REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 17, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 238

Citing Cases

Park v. Long Island Insurance Company

We disagree. The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the plaintiffs had "no right to be present at each…