From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lainesse v. Clairs Cafeteria

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 23, 1966
184 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34935.

March 23, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Richard L. Seidel, Miami, for petitioner.

Lewis F. Cohen, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney's fees are both denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lainesse v. Clairs Cafeteria

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 23, 1966
184 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Lainesse v. Clairs Cafeteria

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY M. LAINESSE, PETITIONER, v. ST. CLAIRS CAFETERIA AND THE FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 23, 1966

Citations

184 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1966)