In Laimbeer v. Tailer, 21 N.Y. St. Repr. 380; S.C., 4 N.Y.S. 588, it appeared that by the original lease it was particularly specified that the tenant's occupation should extend for one year from November 1, 1871.
Summary of this case from Gilfoyle v. CahillSubmitted January 14, 1891
Decided February 3, 1891
Geo. W. Van Siclen for appellant.
E.R. DeGrove for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Laimbeer v. Tailer, 21 N.Y. St. Repr. 380; S.C., 4 N.Y.S. 588, it appeared that by the original lease it was particularly specified that the tenant's occupation should extend for one year from November 1, 1871.
Summary of this case from Gilfoyle v. CahillFull title:WILLIAM E. LAIMBEER, Appellant, v . ROBERT W. TAILER et al., as Executors…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 3, 1891
2 R.S. (9th ed.) 1816, § 1. Adams v. City of Cohoes, supra, being the latest authoritative decision in…