From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lahroudi v. Mayorkas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-1531 (CKK) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-1531 (CKK)

05-02-2014

ALI FEIZOLLAHI LAHROUDI, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 18, 2014, Defendants filed a [7] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"). Plaintiff is represented by Counsel. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff was required to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by no later than April 4, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' [7] Motion to Dismiss nor has Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion. Accordingly, the Court shall treat Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as conceded and dismiss the case. See LCvR 7(b) ("If such a memorandum is not filed within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.").

__________

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lahroudi v. Mayorkas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-1531 (CKK) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Lahroudi v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:ALI FEIZOLLAHI LAHROUDI, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: May 2, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-1531 (CKK) (D.D.C. May. 2, 2014)