From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lahrman v. Scheibenberger

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Oct 2, 2008
CAUSE NO: 3:08-CV-354 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CAUSE NO: 3:08-CV-354 RM.

October 2, 2008


OPINION AND ORDER


On September 17, 2008, Timothy Lahrman filed a motion to reconsider and correct the court's August 14, 2008 opinion and order denying Mr. Lahrman's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court denied Mr. Lahrman's motion on September 23, finding no manifest error of law or extraordinary circumstances sufficient to justify relief under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). Mr. Lahrman filed a second motion to reconsider, which reiterates Mr. Lahrman's previous arguments. For the reasons set forth in the court's September 23, 2008 order, the court DENIES Mr. Lahrman's motion pursuant to Rule 59(e) or 60(b) [Doc. No. 10]. Mr. Lahrman also filed an amended motion to reconsider and supporting memorandum to "further expound upon" his September 17 filing. Because the court previously ruled on Mr. Lahrman's motion to reconsider, the court also DENIES Mr. Lahrman's amended motion [Doc. No. 11].

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lahrman v. Scheibenberger

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Oct 2, 2008
CAUSE NO: 3:08-CV-354 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Lahrman v. Scheibenberger

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY J. LAHRMAN, individually and as Founder/President of Automotive…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

CAUSE NO: 3:08-CV-354 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 2, 2008)