From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lahrichi v. Lumera Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 9, 2009
CASE NO. C04-2124-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C04-2124-JCC.

April 9, 2009


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Court's 03/23/09 Sealed Order (Dkt. No. 260). The local rules require that a motion for reconsideration "shall be filed within ten judicial days after the order to which it relates is filed." Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(2). Accordingly, the deadline to file a motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 23, 2009, Order was April 6, 2009. See id. Plaintiff filed the instant motion for partial reconsideration on April 7, 2009. ( See Dkt. No. 260.)

The Court is not inclined to consider Plaintiffs untimely and "disfavored" motion, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h), which asks the Court to reconsider numerous aspects of its previous detailed review of Plaintiff's excruciatingly voluminous sealing requests on limited remand. Plaintiff's untimely motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 260) is therefore DENIED.

Prior to its consideration of Plaintiff's appeal, the Ninth Circuit remanded the case back to this Court for the limited purpose of considering Plaintiff's motion to seal. ( See Dkt. No. 214.)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lahrichi v. Lumera Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 9, 2009
CASE NO. C04-2124-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Lahrichi v. Lumera Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ADIL LAHRICHI, Plaintiff, v. LUMERA CORP., MICROVISION, and THOMAS D…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Apr 9, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C04-2124-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2009)