From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lahon v. Artus

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 19, 2008
9:06-CV-0585 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)

Opinion

9:06-CV-0585 (LEK/VEB).

August 19, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on July 24, 2008, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 11).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Darryl Lawrence Lahon's letter request to discontinue his habeas petition pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. No. 10) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lahon v. Artus

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 19, 2008
9:06-CV-0585 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Lahon v. Artus

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL LAWRENCE LAHON, Petitioner, v. DALE ARTUS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

9:06-CV-0585 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)