From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laguna v. Coverall N. Am., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 20, 2014
772 F.3d 608 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 12–55479.

2014-11-20

Sabrina LAGUNA, an individual; Carlos Acevedo, an individual; Teresa Salas, an individual; Roes 3–50, on behalf of themselves and in a representative capacity for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellees, Amrit Singh, Objector–Appellant, v. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation; Allied Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation; Ares Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation; CNA Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Ted Elliott, an individual; Does, 5–50, inclusive, Defendants–Appellees.

Shannon Liss–Riordan (argued), Licthen & Liss–Riordan, P.C., Boston, MA; Monique Olivier, Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Objector–Appellant. Raul Cadena & Nicole R. Roysdon, Cadena Churchill, LLP, San Diego, CA; L. Tracee Lorens & Wayne Alan Hughes, Lorens & Associates, APLC, San Diego CA, for Plaintiffs–Appellees.


Shannon Liss–Riordan (argued), Licthen & Liss–Riordan, P.C., Boston, MA; Monique Olivier, Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Objector–Appellant. Raul Cadena & Nicole R. Roysdon, Cadena Churchill, LLP, San Diego, CA; L. Tracee Lorens & Wayne Alan Hughes, Lorens & Associates, APLC, San Diego CA, for Plaintiffs–Appellees.
Norman M. Leon (argued), DLA Piper LLP, Chicago, IL; Mazda K. Antia, Cooley LLP (argued), San Diego, CA; Jeffrey A. Rosenfeld & Nancy Nguyen Sims, DLA Piper LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants–Appellees.

Theodore H. Frank, Center for Class Action Fairness, Washington, D.C.; Adam Ezra Schulman, Student Press Law Center, Arlington, VA, for Amicus Curiae Center for Class Action Fairness.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No.3:09–cv–02131–JM–BGS.
Before: RONALD M. GOULD and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

ORDER

The court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in this action. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT, and the previously filed opinion reported at 753 F.3d 918 (9th Cir.2014) is VACATED. Each party shall bear its own costs.

The Honorable Edward M. Chen, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.


Summaries of

Laguna v. Coverall N. Am., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 20, 2014
772 F.3d 608 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Laguna v. Coverall N. Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Sabrina LAGUNA, an individual; Carlos Acevedo, an individual; Teresa…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

772 F.3d 608 (9th Cir. 2014)