Opinion
8:24-cv-372-SDM-AEP
05-14-2024
LAGIGUAN UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant.
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Lagiguan Underwood alleges that a Home Depot employee driving a forklift “crashed” into a parked truck in which Underwood sat and that the crash injured Underwood. Home Depot removes (Doc. 1) the action. Underwoods moves (Doc. 8) to remand, and Home Depot responds (Doc. 11) in opposition.
Underwood contends that, because the notice of removal cites a civil cover sheet and a settlement demand to establish the amount in controversy, Home Depot failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Without more, a civil cover sheet and a demand letter are generally insufficient to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Bell v. Ace Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2020 WL 7396934, at *3 (M.D. Fla. 2020) (Badalamenti, J.); Piazza v. Ambassador II JV, L.P., 2010 WL 2889218 (M.D. Fla. 2010) (citing Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1097 (11th Cir. 1995), and quoting Standridge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 945 F.Supp. 252, 256-57 (N.D.Ga. 1996)); Fields v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2008 WL 2705424 (M.D. Fla. 2008) (Fawsett, C.J.). But in addition to the cover sheet and demand, Home Depot appends to the notice of removal Underwood's medical bills that allegedly resulted from the crash. The medical bills total more than $100,000.
The motion (Doc. 8) to remand is DENIED. No later than MAY 28, 2024, the parties must submit a case management report in accord with Local Rule 3.02.
ORDERED.