From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lage v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 29, 2022
655 S.W.3d 467 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84945

11-29-2022

Jason LAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Mark Allen Grothoff, Columbia, MO for appellant. Zeb Charlton, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.


Mark Allen Grothoff, Columbia, MO for appellant.

Zeb Charlton, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Jason Lage appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Lage asserts that the motion court committed clear error in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain gunshot residue testing on samples collected by police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Lage v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 29, 2022
655 S.W.3d 467 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Lage v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jason LAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

655 S.W.3d 467 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)