From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaForge v. Down

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jul 2, 2019
No. CV-17-48-BLG-BMM (D. Mont. Jul. 2, 2019)

Opinion

CV-17-48-BLG-BMM

07-02-2019

MICHAEL F. LAFORGE, Plaintiff, v. JANICE GETS DOWN, NATASHA S. MORTON, LEROY NOT AFRAID, SHELIA WILKENSON NOT AFRAID, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

United States Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on May 28, 2019. (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff Michael LaForge, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action on May 5, 2017. (Doc. 9.) The Court dismissed with prejudice Defendants Natasha S. Morton, Leroy Not Afraid, and Shelia Wilkenson Not Afraid. (Docs. 33, 36.)

The Court ordered LaForge to show cause, in writing, as to why the Court should not dismiss the case for failure to serve properly Defendant Janice Gets Down pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. (Doc. 37.) LaForge responded by filing a Motion to File Evidence (Doc. 38) on April 19, 2019, and filing a Motion to File Evidence (Doc. 39) on May 8, 2019. Judge Cavan noted the evidence that accompanied both motions in his Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 40 at 2.) The Court will grant both of LaForge's motions.

Judge Cavan determined that the Court must assist with LaForge, who proceeds in forma pauperis, with service if the Court determines that LaForge has stated plausible claims for relief. (Doc. 40 at 2.) Judge Cavan concluded that LaForge had failed to set forth any facts that would support a determination that Gets Down could be held liable for any of the LaForge's alleged claims. Id. at 7. Judge Cavan recommended that the Court dismiss with prejudice LaForge's claims against Gets Down and enter final judgment in this matter. Id.

Neither party filed objections. The Court reviews findings and recommendations not objected to for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). The Court finds no error in Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. LaForge's Motion to File Evidence (Doc. 38) is GRANTED.

2. LaForge's Motion to File Evidence (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.
3. Judge Cavan's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

4. LaForge's claims against Gets Down are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal.

DATED this 2nd day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

LaForge v. Down

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jul 2, 2019
No. CV-17-48-BLG-BMM (D. Mont. Jul. 2, 2019)
Case details for

LaForge v. Down

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL F. LAFORGE, Plaintiff, v. JANICE GETS DOWN, NATASHA S. MORTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

No. CV-17-48-BLG-BMM (D. Mont. Jul. 2, 2019)

Citing Cases

Gabriel v. Olsen

Such a dismissal may be made without notice where the claimant cannot possibly win relief.” (internal…