LaForest v. LaForest

Full title: BRIAN JAMES LAFOREST, Petitioner, v. DANIELLE DEANNE LAFOREST, Respondent.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 11, 2019

284 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 4D19-2189

12-11-2019

Brian James LAFOREST, Petitioner, v. Danielle Deanne LAFOREST, Respondent.

Matthew S. Nugent and Adam M. Zborowski of Nugent Zborowski, North Palm Beach, for appellant. Jonathan M. Galler and Howard M. Rudolph of Rudolph & Associates LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew S. Nugent and Adam M. Zborowski of Nugent Zborowski, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jonathan M. Galler and Howard M. Rudolph of Rudolph & Associates LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We grant the husband's petition for writ of certiorari in part and quash the trial court's order requiring disclosure of his mental health treatment records. The trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in failing to provide for the mandatory in camera inspection to ensure that only relevant documents and information are disclosed. Zarzaur v. Zarzaur , 213 So. 3d 1115, 1120 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). The court may order production in a manner that allows for in camera review.

Petition granted in part and denied in part.

Ciklin, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.