From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lafond v. Zuniga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
2:22-cv-1093 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1093 AC P

01-18-2023

RAOUL LAFOND, Petitioner, v. RAPHAEL ZUNIGA, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 13, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. To date, petitioner has not filed a response to the motion. Therefore, petitioner will be ordered to file a response and to do so within thirty days. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 5(e); Rule 1(b) (stating Section 2254 rules may be applied to non-2254 habeas petitions).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order petitioner shall file a response to respondent's motion to dismiss.

Petitioner is cautioned that failure to file a response within the time allotted will result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed.


Summaries of

Lafond v. Zuniga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
2:22-cv-1093 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Lafond v. Zuniga

Case Details

Full title:RAOUL LAFOND, Petitioner, v. RAPHAEL ZUNIGA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1093 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)