From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lafferty v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505360.

April 23, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Adam Lafferty, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Kane, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of damaging state property and ordering him to pay restitution. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the administrative determination has been reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge, together with any moneys paid by petitioner toward the restitution imposed, have been refunded to him. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Arriaga v Smith, 55 AD3d 1115).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Lafferty v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Lafferty v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ADAM LAFFERTY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 23, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3073
876 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

In re Smalls

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

In re Johnson

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him…