Opinion
Master File No. C-12-06199 CRB
05-08-2013
IN RE HP ERISA LITIGATION
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice) EDWARD H. GLENN JR. (admitted pro hac vice) KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice) ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice) EDWARD H. GLENN, JR. (admitted pro hac vice) KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice) Jacob H. Zamansky JACOB H. ZAMANSKY Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP NICOLE A. DILLER ROBERTA H. VESPREMI SACHA M. STEENHOEK NICOLE A. DILLER MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP CHARLES C. JACKSON ( admitted pro hac vice ) ANDREW SCROGGINS ( admitted pro hac vice ) Attorneys for Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company, JOHN C. DWYER STEPHEN C. NEAL JEFFREY M. KABAN JEFFREY M. WALKER Attorneys for Defendant Margaret C. Whitman SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM ALLEN J. RUBY TIMOTHY A. MILLER RICHARD S. HORVATH, JR. TIMOTHY A. MILLER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP ERIC S. WAXMAN Attorneys for Defendants Rajiv L. Gupta, Shumeet Banerji, John H. Hammergren, Marc L. Andreessen, Raymond J. Lane, Gary Reiner, G. Kennedy Thompson, Patricia F. Russo, Ralph Whitworth, and Ann M. Livermore
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARD H. GLENN JR. (admitted pro hac vice)
KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice)
ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CLASS ACTION
[Civil L.R. 6-2]
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND AMONG COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES as follows:
WHEREAS, plaintiff has requested and defendants have consented to an enlargement of time for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint in the above-captioned action;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs are currently due to file their amended complaint by May 20, 2013;
WHEREAS, defendants are currently due to file responsive pleadings by July 5, 2013;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs are currently due to file their opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed, by September 3, 2013;
WHEREAS, defendants are currently due to file their reply briefs in support of any motions to dismiss by October 3, 2013
WHEREAS, the parties prefer to keep the briefing schedule roughly aligned with that of the shareholder derivative action and putative securities class action before this Court; and
WHEREAS, there are no other pending dates set by the Court that would be affected by entry of this Order.
THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, and respectfully requested that the Court order as follows:
1. Plaintiffs shall have until June 3, 2013 to file their amended complaint;
2. Defendants shall have until July 18, 2013 to file their responsive pleadings;
3. Plaintiffs shall have until September 3, 2013 to file their opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss, assuming such motions are filed; and
4. Defendants shall have until October 3, 2013 to file their reply briefs in support of any motions to dismiss.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ZAMANSKY & ASSOCIATES LLC
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY (admitted pro hac vice)
EDWARD H. GLENN, JR. (admitted pro hac vice)
KEVIN D. GALBRAITH (admitted pro hac vice)
Jacob H. Zamansky
JACOB H. ZAMANSKY
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
and the Proposed Class
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
NICOLE A. DILLER
ROBERTA H. VESPREMI
SACHA M. STEENHOEK
___________
NICOLE A. DILLER
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
CHARLES C. JACKSON (admitted pro hac vice)
ANDREW SCROGGINS (admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company,
the Plan Committee, and the Investment Review
Committee
COOLEY LLP ___________
JOHN C. DWYER
STEPHEN C. NEAL
JEFFREY M. KABAN
JEFFREY M. WALKER
Attorneys for Defendant Margaret C. Whitman SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
ALLEN J. RUBY
TIMOTHY A. MILLER
RICHARD S. HORVATH, JR.
___________
TIMOTHY A. MILLER
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
ERIC S. WAXMAN
Attorneys for Defendants Rajiv L. Gupta, Shumeet
Banerji, John H. Hammergren, Marc L. Andreessen,
Raymond J. Lane, Gary Reiner, G. Kennedy
Thompson, Patricia F. Russo, Ralph Whitworth, and
Ann M. Livermore
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________
THE HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE