From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaFayette v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jan 22, 2008
File No. 1:07-CV-2 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)

Opinion

File No. 1:07-CV-2.

January 22, 2008


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed December 21, 2007 (Paper 8). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Paper 5) is DENIED as moot.

Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 22(b), the Court DENIES petitioner a certificate of appealability ("COA") because the petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Court rejects the petition on its merits because the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1604, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000).

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LaFayette v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jan 22, 2008
File No. 1:07-CV-2 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)
Case details for

LaFayette v. Hofmann

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN LaFAYETTE, Petitioner v. ROBERT HOFMANN, Commissioner, Vermont…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

File No. 1:07-CV-2 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)