From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ladmer v. Savino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 30, 2001.

June 18, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated February 20, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Hobbes Tonetti (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N Y [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellants.

Donner, Hariton Berka, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Ira M. Hariton and Jay L.T. Breakstone of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured by a horse during her visit to a farm owned by the defendants William S. Savino, Jr., and Marian Savino. Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the doctrine of assumption of the risk (see, Lecznar v. Sanford, 265 A.D.2d 728).

SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO, FEUERSTEIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ladmer v. Savino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Ladmer v. Savino

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN LADMER, respondent, v. WILLIAM A. SAVINO, JR., ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 570