From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ladesso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's contention that the court erred in delivering a missing witness charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPLR 4110-b, 4017, 5501 [a] [3]; De Long v. County of Erie, 60 N.Y.2d 296, 306), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (cf., Sluzar v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 223 A.D.2d 785).

We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find they are without merit. Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ladesso v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 1996
229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Ladesso v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LADESSO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

Everett v. Timmins

The record does not indicate that plaintiffs objected or took exception to the court's decision to give a…