From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ladd v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-07868-RGK (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-07868-RGK (AFM)

07-31-2020

CHRISTOPHER LADD, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and Objections have not been received. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: July 31, 2020

/s/_________

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ladd v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-07868-RGK (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Ladd v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LADD, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-07868-RGK (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2020)