From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ladd v. Everett

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 23, 1987
522 A.2d 912 (Me. 1987)

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1987.

Decided March 23, 1987.

Appeal from the Appeal from Superior Court Somerset County.

Sidney H. Geller, Waterville, William Thomas Hyde (orally), Skowhegan, for plaintiffs.

Shiro Shiro, John O'Donnell (orally), Waterville, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from a judgment of the District Court, Skowhegan, in favor of the plaintiffs, Lullyn and Georgie Ladd, the defendant, Robert Everett, urges reversal on a ground raised for the first time in the Superior Court on appeal. We decline to consider a ground of relief that the defendant did not present in the District Court. Reville v. Reville, 289 A.2d 695, 697-98 (Me. 1972). In addition, we conclude that the limitation imposed upon cross-examination of a witness was within the scope of the District Court's discretion. M.R.Evid. 611(a).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Ladd v. Everett

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 23, 1987
522 A.2d 912 (Me. 1987)
Case details for

Ladd v. Everett

Case Details

Full title:Georgie LADD et al. v. Robert EVERETT

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Mar 23, 1987

Citations

522 A.2d 912 (Me. 1987)