From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LACY v. OLD STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE, INC.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02351-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02351-EWN-MEH.

June 30, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the THIRD patently-defective motion filed by Plaintiffs. The first motion (#93) was nothing but a blank sheet. The second motion (#96) was denied because Plaintiffs failed to follow local rule 7.1A. The present (third) motion (#99) appears to be identical to the second and, again, fails to indicate any compliance with local rule 7.1A. It is therefore

ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion (#99) is DENIED.

2. Future noncompliance by counsel will result in sanctions AGAINST COUNSEL.


Summaries of

LACY v. OLD STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE, INC.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-cv-02351-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 30, 2006)
Case details for

LACY v. OLD STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE, INC.

Case Details

Full title:N. LEE LACY, an individual, and ROARING VALLEY FORKS HOLDINGS, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-cv-02351-EWN-MEH (D. Colo. Jun. 30, 2006)