From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LACY v. HOLIDAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Aug 24, 1973
85 N.M. 460 (N.M. 1973)

Opinion

No. 9655.

July 13, 1973. Rehearing Denied August 24, 1973.

Appeal from the District Court, Bernalillo County, Harry E. Stowers, Jr., D. J.

James R. Toulouse Associates, James C. Hall, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellant.

Keleher McLeod, John B. Tittmann, Albuquerque, for defendants-appellees.


OPINION


Plaintiff-Appellant sued, alleging breach of fiducial obligations owed him as a result of a partnership of which he had been a member.

The trial court's decision included findings of fact consistent with honesty and fair dealing on the part of the defendants-appellees and inconsistent with appellant's factual predicate. It also denied findings of fact requested by appellant which were essential to his case.

In attempting to attack these actions of the trial court, appellant's brief falls far short of compliance with the second paragraph of Supreme Court Rule 15(6) [§ 21-2-1(15)(6), N.M.S.A. 1953]. Compliance with portions of Supreme Court Rule 15(16)(b) and (c) [§ 21-2-1(15)(16) (b c), N.M.S.A. 1953] ranges from slight to none.

We will accordingly consider the matter no further. The judgment from which the appeal is taken is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

McMANUS, C. J., and MONTOYA, J., concur.


Summaries of

LACY v. HOLIDAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Aug 24, 1973
85 N.M. 460 (N.M. 1973)
Case details for

LACY v. HOLIDAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:Joseph E. LACY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLIDAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Aug 24, 1973

Citations

85 N.M. 460 (N.M. 1973)
513 P.2d 394

Citing Cases

Olguin v. Manning

We will not review issues raised for which there are insufficient references to the record or transcript as…

Matter of Doe

I. Respondent challenges numerous of the trial court's findings of fact. Her brief, in large part, sets forth…