From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacy v. Guthrie Clinic, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Steuben County, Scudder, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Lawton, Davis and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and new trial granted. Memorandum: In this medical malpractice action, Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint at the close of all the evidence. Plaintiffs made out a prima facie case (see, Rhabb v. New York City Hous. Auth., 41 N.Y.2d 200, 202).

A trial court may dismiss a complaint at the close of the evidence presented (see, CPLR 4401) only if there is no rational basis whereby the jury might find for the plaintiff as against the moving defendants (Rhabb v. New York City Hous. Auth., supra; Spano v. County of Onondaga, 135 A.D.2d 1091, appeal dismissed 71 N.Y.2d 994; Ehlinger v. Board of Educ., 96 A.D.2d 708, 709; Nicholas v. Reason, 84 A.D.2d 915). On such a motion, the defendant movant has the burden of showing that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case (Nicholas v Reason, supra) and plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence (Parvi v. City of Kingston, 41 N.Y.2d 553, 554; Spano v. County of Onondaga, supra; O'Neil v Port Auth., 111 A.D.2d 375, 376; Nicholas v. Reason, supra).

Plaintiffs presented proof that each of defendant doctors failed properly and timely to diagnose plaintiff Susan Lacy's herniated cervical disc, failed to order proper diagnostic testing, or misread the results of diagnostic tests. Plaintiffs' experts also testified that defendants' actions were a proximate cause of the delayed diagnosis and ongoing injury and that, because the neck injury was undiagnosed and untreated until a year and a half later, plaintiff Susan Lacy experienced pain and suffering and progression of nerve injury and is more prone to subsequent injury later in life. Thus, plaintiffs' claim should have gone to the jury for determination (see, Nicholas v. Reason, supra; Monahan v. Weichert, 82 A.D.2d 102, 105-108).


Summaries of

Lacy v. Guthrie Clinic, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Lacy v. Guthrie Clinic, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN LACY et al., Appellants, v. GUTHRIE CLINIC, LTD., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Sisson v. Lech

As a provisional employee, petitioner could be discharged at will, absent proof that such discharge "was for…

Jones v. Great American Grocery Store

Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when another customer punched her…