Opinion
October 2, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feinberg, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The appeal is in the nature of an appeal from an order determining an application to review objections raised at an examination before trial, and such an order is not appealable as a matter of right (see, Stoller v. Moo Young Jun, 118 A.D.2d 637; Sainz v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 106 A.D.2d 500). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.