From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lachica v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1984
101 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

May 29, 1984


In a claim to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant State of New York appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Orlando, J.), dated August 5, 1983, which, inter alia, granted claimant's motion insofar as it sought leave to file a late claim against it for breach of contract (see Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 6). ¶ Order affirmed, with costs. ¶ Where, as here, the majority of the factors enumerated in subdivision 6 of the section 10 CTC of the Court of Claims Act are in favor of claimant, the Court of Claims cannot be said to have abused its discretion by granting the application to file a late claim (see, e.g., Bay Terrace Coop. v New York State Employees' Retirement System, 55 N.Y.2d 979; Matter of Butler v State of New York, 81 A.D.2d 834). Gibbons, J.P., O'Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lachica v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1984
101 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Lachica v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUBY D. LACHICA, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 29, 1984

Citations

101 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. State

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Where, as here, the delay in filing the notice of claim was…

Prusack v. State

The Court of Claims determination that the State had notice of the essential facts constituting the claim and…