From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacey v. McClure Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Apr 24, 1920
223 S.W. 872 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 9333.

April 24, 1920.

Error from Erath County Court; W. E. Bowers, Judge.

Action between A. T. Lacey and the McClure Company. From a judgment entered the former brings error. Dismissed.

Chandler Pannill, of Stephenville, and H. E. Trippet, of Waco, for plaintiff in error.

H. S. Lattimore, of Ft. Worth, for defendant in error.


The judgment in this case appears to have been entered October 8, 1918. The motion for new trial was overruled November 16, 1918. The petition for writ of error and bond were filed October 25, 1919. The year, under the law prior to the amendment by the Thirty-Sixth Legislature, page 136, reducing the time to six months, expired before the petition and bond of error were filed. The time for suing out a writ of error begins with the date of final judgment, and not with the date of overruling a motion for new trial. Cooper v. Yoakum, 91 Tex. 391, 43 S.W. 871. Therefore, without reference to the amendment of the law passed by the Thirty-Sixth Legislature, which became effective June 17, 1919, this writ was not sued out in time to give this court jurisdiction, and therefore the appeal by writ of error should be dismissed. Carpenter v. Carpenter, 142 S.W. 633. This is true whether the new law or the old applies. Odum v. Garner, 86 Tex. 374, 25 S.W. 18; Compton v. Ashley, 28 S.W. 924.

The appeal is dismissed, at cost of plaintiff in error.


Summaries of

Lacey v. McClure Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Apr 24, 1920
223 S.W. 872 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)
Case details for

Lacey v. McClure Co.

Case Details

Full title:LACEY v. McCLURE CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 24, 1920

Citations

223 S.W. 872 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Citing Cases

Foster v. Bourgeois

Witt, Terrell Witt, for defendants in error. The bills of exception were not filed within the time allowed by…

Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Hammon

This has been followed by an unbroken line of decisions. Williams v. Knight Realty Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 217…