From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacey v. Hamkar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
No. 2:10-CV-1695-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-CV-1695-JAM-CMK

08-07-2012

JASON LACEY, Plaintiff, v. B. HAMKAR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration (Doc. 37) of the Magistrate Judge's February 24, 2012, order.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The February 24, 2012, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 37) is denied;

2. The Magistrate Judge's February 24, 2012, order is affirmed; and

3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lacey v. Hamkar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
No. 2:10-CV-1695-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Lacey v. Hamkar

Case Details

Full title:JASON LACEY, Plaintiff, v. B. HAMKAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-CV-1695-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)