From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacey v. Atchley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 20, 2024
2:21-cv-07838-VBF-SP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-07838-VBF-SP

08-20-2024

LINDSEY LACEY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 18) is granted in part, and Ground Three is stricken from the First Amended Petition.


Summaries of

Lacey v. Atchley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 20, 2024
2:21-cv-07838-VBF-SP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Lacey v. Atchley

Case Details

Full title:LINDSEY LACEY, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 20, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-07838-VBF-SP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2024)