From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaBreck v. Esposito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. 11-11328 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-11328

10-28-2011

PETER JOSHUA LABRECK, Plaintiff, v. PAUL ANTHONY ESPOSITO, et al., Defendants.


Hon.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On May 12, 2011, the court granted Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his complaint. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, seeks reconsideration of the court's order. The court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint because he failed to allege state action in support of his § 1983 claim. Plaintiff seeks to amend his complaint to add state actors as defendants and clarify his allegations. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status and a preference for determining cases on the merits, the court finds that it is in the interests of justice to set aside the judgment and permit Plaintiff to amend his complaint.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order dismissing Plaintiff's case and the judgment are VACATED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon Plaintiff on this date, October 31, 2011, at FCI Milan, P.O. Box 1000, Milan, Michigan 48160 by first-class U.S. mail.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

LaBreck v. Esposito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. 11-11328 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

LaBreck v. Esposito

Case Details

Full title:PETER JOSHUA LABRECK, Plaintiff, v. PAUL ANTHONY ESPOSITO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-11328 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 28, 2011)