From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Labranche v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-2768 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 20-2768 (UNA)

09-30-2020

JAMIE LABRANCHE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint.

A pro se litigant's pleadings are held to less stringent standards than would be applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

This plaintiff demands an award of $3,352,787.69 for reasons that are unclear. Mentioned are two cases plaintiff filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the alleged destruction of documents submitted to the Fifth Circuit for in camera review, and crimes allegedly committed by the President of the United States and other federal government officials. The complaint fails to include a short and plain statement of a claim showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief of any kind.

The Court concludes that the complaint, as drafted, does not meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8. Accordingly, the complaint and this civil action will be dismissed without prejudice, and the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. An Order is issued separately. DATE: September 30, 2020

/s/

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Labranche v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-2768 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Labranche v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE LABRANCHE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 20-2768 (UNA) (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2020)