From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaBossiere v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1992
187 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 2, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Irving Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the psychological examination of the infant plaintiff shall be conducted at a time and place to be specified by the defendants in a written notice of not less than 10 days, or at such time and place as the parties may agree.

The plaintiffs allege that the infant plaintiff, as the result of a fall when he was 19 months of age, suffers from a variety of conditions, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. At the request of the defendants, he was examined by a psychiatrist, who asserted that it was highly unlikely that the alleged disorder was the result of the fall, but stressed that for a diagnosis of the disorder to be validly made, the child would have to be examined by a psychologist.

The defendants have demonstrated that the proposed psychological examination would yield information material and relevant to the defense (see, Carden v Callocchio, 100 A.D.2d 608). The plaintiffs have not alleged that they will be prejudiced by the examination, nor have they given any reason sufficient to support denial of the relief sought (see, Burger v Bladt, 112 A.D.2d 127). Under the circumstances of this case, we substitute our discretion for that of the Supreme Court (see, Carden v Callocchio, supra), and grant the motion. Thompson, J.P., Harwood, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LaBossiere v. Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1992
187 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

LaBossiere v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:DARNEL LaBOSSIERE et al., Respondents, v. CONSTANTINE HUDSON et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Luxenberg v. Jericho Assocs

Notably, that case involved claims of psychological or neurological injuries for which the defendant's…

Wilson v. New York Power Authority

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for an…