From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laborin v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 27, 2011
2: 08 - cv - 1998 - TJB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

2: 08-cv-1998-TJB.

October 27, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 30, 2010, the undersigned issued an order denying Petitioner's petition and judgment was entered.

On October 6, 2011, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). On October 26, 2011, Respondent filed a motion for an extension of time to file a response to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration. Based upon the representations made and only for this request, it is determined that good cause has been shown, and the request is granted. Respondent is advised, however, that no further extensions of time will be granted, except for verified and extraordinary good cause shown.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's request filed October 26, 2011 for an extension of time to file a response to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is GRANTED; and
2. Respondent shall have until November 28, 2011 to file a response to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Laborin v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 27, 2011
2: 08 - cv - 1998 - TJB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Laborin v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE LABORIN, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

2: 08 - cv - 1998 - TJB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)