Opinion
04-CV-5466 (NGG)(MDG).
March 30, 2006
ORDER
On March 9, 2006 Magistrate Judge Marilyn Dolan Go issued a Report and Recommendation ("RR") in the above-captioned action recommending that the Plaintiff be awarded judgment in the amount of $1,509.16, plus statutory interest from the date of entry of default. No objections to the RR have been timely filed.
In reviewing an RR, this court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In order to accept a Magistrate Judge's RR where no timely objection has been made, the "court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp.2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (quoting Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)); see also Pizarro v. Bartlett, 776 F. Supp. 815, 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (court may accept report if it is "not facially erroneous").
The court finds no clear error in the RR and therefore adopts the RR for the reasons stated therein. The plaintiffs are hereby awarded $1,509.16, plus statutory interest from the date of entry of default.
SO ORDERED.