From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laborde v. Town of Mansura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 26, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-00491 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-00491

10-26-2016

CHRISTOPHER LABORDE, Plaintiff v. TOWN OF MANSURA, Defendant


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

The Court interprets the Report and Recommendation to say that Plaintiff's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") Complaint filed on July 1, 2013 was timely as it was filed within 300 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The 300 day filing period under 42 U.S.C § 2000e-5(e)(1) does not require a state law claim to be expressly raised in order to be triggered.

Noting the absence of objections thereto, and affirming the Magistrate Judge's findings on that basis;

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) is DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 26th day of October, 2016.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Laborde v. Town of Mansura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 26, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-00491 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Laborde v. Town of Mansura

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LABORDE, Plaintiff v. TOWN OF MANSURA, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-00491 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)