From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Label v. Label

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-09481.

November 30, 2010.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (MacKenzie, J.), dated August 31, 2009, which, without a hearing, granted the plaintiff wife's motion for an award of an attorney's fee in connection with the husband's prior appeal from an order of the same court dated July 18, 2008, which had been determined by decision and order of this Court dated February 16, 2010 ( Label v Label, 70 AD3d 898).

Arnold B. Firestone, P.C., Hauppauge, N.Y. (Tina Marone-Tew of counsel), for appellant.

The Sallah Law Firm, P.C., Holtsville, N.Y. (Patrick M. Kerr of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff wife's motion for an award of an attorney's fee to defend against the prior appeal by the husband in this matrimonial action ( see O'Shea v O'Shea, 93 NY2d 187, 190; Bogannam v Bogannam, 60 AD3d 985, 987; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61, 65; Garner v Garner, 46 AD3d 1258, 1259; Matter of Vitek v Vitek, 170 AD2d 908, 910; Delgado v Delgado, 160 AD2d 385, 386; Carlan v Carlan, 112 AD2d 911).


Summaries of

Label v. Label

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Label v. Label

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE ANSELMO LABEL, Respondent, v. STUART LABEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8903
911 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Talty v. Talty

Stated differently, the proceeding is terminated when an appeal has concluded and no more appellate relief is…

In the Matter of Kevin J. Talty v. Talty

Stated differently, the proceeding is terminated when an appeal has concluded and no more appellate relief is…