From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Labasbas v. Rogers

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Aug 8, 2007
Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-55 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 8, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-55.

August 8, 2007


ORDER DIRECTING THE SUBMISSION OF AFFIDAVITS BY PLAINTIFFS


This matter is now before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [Doc. 13]. In support of the motion, plaintiffs contend that the amount in controversy falls short of the jurisdictional limit of $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). In response, defendants note that, in addition to the claim for compensatory damages, plaintiffs' Complaint [Doc. 1] contains a $100,000 punitive damage demand. As such, the defendants argue that the amount in controversy, based on the plaintiffs' Complaint [Doc. 1], is well in excess of the jurisdictional requirement of $75,000.

In recognition of the above, and to the extent that the plaintiffs wish to pursue their Motion to Remand [Doc. 13], the Court DIRECTS each plaintiff to file with the Clerk an affidavit setting forth a binding limit on total damages (punitive and compensatory) including fees, if sought, that the plaintiffs will seek and accept in the present action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), the stipulated amount shall not include interest and costs.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit true copies of this Order to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Labasbas v. Rogers

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Aug 8, 2007
Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-55 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Labasbas v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:ARNUFO O. LABASBAS and LILLIE LABASBAS, Plaintiffs, v. SHARI H. ROGERS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg

Date published: Aug 8, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-55 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 8, 2007)