Labarr v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.

Full title: CAMELLIA LABARR, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 19, 2022

Civil Action 2:21-cv-03849 (E.D. Pa. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-cv-03849

05-19-2022

CAMELLIA LABARR, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., Defendant.

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW this 18^th day of May 2022, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF 11), Plaintiff's Response (ECF Nos. 14-16), Defendant's Reply (ECF 18), Plaintiff's Supplemental Briefing (ECF Nos. 20-21), and Defendant's Supplemental Briefing (ECF 25) and for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED.

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF 26) is DENIED because Plaintiff's Amended Complaint failed to cure the factual deficiencies contained in Plaintiff's original Complaint and because Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint (ECF 22) in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and this Court's April 7, 2022 Order. ECF 19.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case.