From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laak v. ReconTrust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2012
1:11-cv-3105-CL (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)

Summary

declining to award attorneys' fees where wrongful foreclosure claim dismissed as moot by stipulation following rescission of foreclosure

Summary of this case from Murphy v. First Horizon Home Loan

Opinion

1:11-cv-3105-CL

06-29-2012

KRISTIN LAAK; and PAULINO ARGEAGA, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#18), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Report is correct.

I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#18). Plaintiff's Bill of Costs (#12) and Motion for Fees (#11) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Laak v. ReconTrust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 29, 2012
1:11-cv-3105-CL (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)

declining to award attorneys' fees where wrongful foreclosure claim dismissed as moot by stipulation following rescission of foreclosure

Summary of this case from Murphy v. First Horizon Home Loan
Case details for

Laak v. ReconTrust Co.

Case Details

Full title:KRISTIN LAAK; and PAULINO ARGEAGA, Plaintiffs, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-3105-CL (D. Or. Jun. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. First Horizon Home Loan

The Court, therefore, declines to award attorneys' fees under the catalyst theory. See Laak v. Recontrust…