From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Pommeray v. La Pommeray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1977
56 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

March 7, 1977


In an action for a separation, defendant appeals (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 30, 1976, as awarded plaintiff $200 per week temporary alimony, $130 per week child support and a $1,000 counsel fee and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of a further order of the same court dated October 20, 1976, as denied his motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated October 20, 1976 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion to reargue. Order dated July 30, 1976 modified by reducing the amount awarded as child support to $87 per week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The award of child support should be reduced to $87 per week since that was the amount of plaintiff's initial request and since the record presented does not justify an award of $130. The remedy for any seeming inequity in a temporary order of alimony and allied relief is a speedy trial (Thomases v Thomases, 51 A.D.2d 753). A trial should be held without delay. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

La Pommeray v. La Pommeray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1977
56 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

La Pommeray v. La Pommeray

Case Details

Full title:MONA LA POMMERAY, Respondent, v. LUC LA POMMERAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1977

Citations

56 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Thea v. Thea

iff to liquidate the accumulated arrears at the rate of $100 per week until fully paid. Order modified by…

Schwartz v. Schwartz

Order dated February 7, 1977 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A review of the record on appeal…