La Hunt v. State

Full title: Matthew De La Hunt, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .

Date published: Nov 17, 2015

484 S.W.3d 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102168

11-17-2015

Matthew De La Hunt, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, 6320 Brookside Plaza, # 516, Kansas City, MO 64113, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, 6320 Brookside Plaza, # 516, Kansas City, MO 64113, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).